Emerging Captive Insurance Risk of 2013: Compliance in Local Territories

Emerging Risks

Captive owners and practitioners face the challenge of designing a cost-efficient and silent-running global insurance programme incorporating a captive whilst complying with local territory insurance premium tax (IPT) requirements.

Emerging Risks 2013
This post was part of What Risks Will Emerge in 2013?, published January 23, 2013. The special feature also covered emerging risks in these fields:

This is becoming even more important as local tax authorities are showing signs of enforcing strict compliance rules on foreign (i.e. captive) insurers to protect their local insurance industry.

The solution is for the insurance buyer and the captive to fully understand their respective responsibilities. Global programme premium should be apportioned to each territory on a justifiable (and auditable) basis.

Additionally insurance carriers should be required to provide clear documentary evidence of the management and settlement of foreign IPT. Programme structures should be re-examined to consider the role of non-admitted cover provided by the captive versus local underlying policies.

In the past, risk managers may have chosen to downplay IPT compliance, today tax authorities are forcing a re-think and it is vital that this issue is tackled to avoid unwelcome calls from tax authorities.



Captive Insurance blogger Malcolm Cutts-Watson

Malcolm Cutts-Watson

Guest blogger Malcolm Cutts-Watson

Categories: Captives

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *