Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contracts: LOD or RAD Basis?

When it comes to expressing the period applicable to an excess of loss reinsurance contract, there are two common ways of defining which losses fall within the contract period.

Losses Occurring During

LOD (Losses Occurring During) basis, does exactly what it says and states that the contract will respond to any losses that occur within the contract period. In property insurance (per-risk and catastrophe covers) it is quite straightforward, because the losses generally start at a precise time.

There are a few minor provisos, such as losses that start just before the contract expires and continue beyond expiry, or losses that last several days and may be divided into several distinct events for recovery purposes. Those are quite easily dealt with by appropriate conditions in the contract wording.

LOD in Liability contracts can be a little more tricky, because some losses cannot be attributed to a sudden event. A good example is seen in Employers’ Liability, where an employee could suffer a work-related illness as a result of long-term exposure to hazardous substances or working practices. Again, appropriate clauses are written into the reinsurance contract and I hope to deal with these in later blogs.

Risks Attaching During

RAD (Risks Attaching During) contracts will cover all policies that incept during the contract period, irrespective of when the losses occur. Depending on how the original policies are worded, the losses could emerge several years after the policy itself has expired.

So, using what’s left of my 500 word allowance, let’s discuss the relative merits and drawbacks of each basis.

Starting with LOD:

RAD contracts:

  • Original premium income will be accounted over 2 or more years, so contract premium may be readjusted several times. If there are reinstatement premiums, these may also need to be adjusted to reflect the evolving contract premium
  • Run-off cover is not an issue here. If the reinsured stops writing the class of business and the contract is not renewed, it will continue to cover the policies until all liability has ceased
  • Invoking a Downgrade Clause is not as effective. If the reinsurer is downgraded after the contract has expired, there is no point in invoking the clause, because there will be no premium refund, but liability will continue

If a client is considering switching from one basis to another, there are plenty of pitfalls, so beware.

This post was originally published July 9, 2013.

About Keith Riley

Keith Riley is Divisional Director in Willis Re's Asia Pacific, Middle East, Turkey and Africa team. Keith’s rein…
Categories: Reinsurance | Tags: ,

One Response to Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contracts: LOD or RAD Basis?

  1. Sarthak Behera says:

    Can you please explain the concept of a hybrid where a client wishes a combination of the two basis that you talk about i.e a combination of loss occurring during risk attachment?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *